Loading…

Defending Substitution: An Essay on Atonement in Paul is unavailable, but you can change that!

In recent decades, the church and academy have witnessed intense debates concerning the concept of penal substitution to describe Christ’s atoning sacrifice. A number of theologians, New Testament scholars, and authors of popular Christian literature have taken issue with the concept, claiming that it promotes bloody violence, glorifies suffering and death, and inevitably amounts to divine child...

Indeed, does not Exodus itself say, “Keep far from a false charge, and do not kill the innocent and those in the right, for I will not acquit the guilty” (Exod. 23:7)? Some have responded at this point that the “legal fiction” objection presupposes a highly individualistic and atomistic understanding of human identity, a view of identity that other parts of Scripture might challenge or at least qualify.21 Or again, substitutionary atonement has been accused of being not only
Pages 24–25